Looking at sci-fi through the ages, you can see that these stories aren’t about technology or science. Science fiction is a mirror held up to humanity. Asimov’s robot stories show us human weakness and triumph as glimpsed through a machine. Philip K. Dick steeped his work in the sociological and the political. Bradbury took on some of our darkest human traits, and Butler tackled a wealth of issues including race, class, gender, and sexuality. In this sense, the science of science fiction doesn’t really matter; it’s a tool through which to draw out various human themes. Whether you’re using lasers or robots or space travel, sci-fi is about people, and that’s the only equation that needs to work for the story to come alive.
from Does The Science of Sci-Fi Matter? by Susie Rodarme (via bookriot)
924 notes
  1. pachucocholosychundos reblogged this from strawberryxgashes
  2. silence-lies reblogged this from fatalism-and-villainy
  3. rabbitstitch reblogged this from bookriot
  4. lechatdort reblogged this from in-and-out-of-dreams
  5. in-and-out-of-dreams reblogged this from the-scribblesaur
  6. the-scribblesaur reblogged this from yeahwrite
  7. absoloutenonsense reblogged this from bookriot
  8. awesomeocelot reblogged this from lilinternetwarrior
  9. lightthatlitonfire reblogged this from yeahwrite
  10. xianvar reblogged this from fannishtalk
  11. truerealkevin reblogged this from letstalkimprov
  12. smdy reblogged this from antaresia
  13. sablemarten reblogged this from valswei
  14. pretzal reblogged this from numer0six
  15. areyouready-herewego reblogged this from fandomity
  16. fandomity reblogged this from thearkandtheprincess
  17. thearkandtheprincess reblogged this from mmmpeanutbrittle
  18. mmmpeanutbrittle reblogged this from snkrfnd
  19. snkrfnd reblogged this from pragnificent
  20. broad-grasshopper reblogged this from nebulae-and-bad-jokes
  21. bookriot posted this